Portfolio of priority projects of the Supreme Court

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version

Name: Әділ process (Perfect process)

Relevance: The society still does not recognize legal proceedings as "fast and right", still there are frequent complaints that there is hidden red tape in the courts, bias and injustice of judicial practice.

Purpose: To ensure fair and uniform judicial practice, clarity and optimality of procedural actions, efficiency and transparency of judicial procedures.

As part of the program, it is planned to optimize the judicial process and judicial procedures through the prism of the needs of society, the real simplification of the procedural legislation, analyze the reasonableness and identify the reasons for public dissatisfaction with fairness and objectivity of judicial practice, and work out mechanisms for an adequate assessment of justice by the population.

The project is aimed at:

  • ensuring the right of everyone to be heard in court;
  • ensuring the exhaustive use of the judicial protection mechanism in each case;
  • timely consideration of cases within a reasonable time;
  • increasing the authority of the first and appellate courts;
  • giving an exceptional character to the cassation review of cases;
  • overcoming the accusatory bias in the judicial process;
  • ensuring genuine equality of the parties to the lawsuit;
  • minimization of judicial errors through the formation of stable judicial practice and other measures.
 
Simplified litigation
 
Head: Zhulamanov B.A. - Head of the Legal Support Department of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan
 
Manager: Assainova D.E. - Head of the Legal Support Division of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan
 
Administrator: Kauldasheva A.K. - Chief Consultant of the Analysis and Planning Division Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Phone: 8-7172-71-01-49
 
Consultants / Supervisors:
Agybaeva L.A. - Judge of the Supreme Court Shipp DA - Judge of the Supreme Court Toktarov B.Zh. - Judge of the Supreme Court
Sizintsev S.V. - Advocate of the North Kazakhstan Bar Association, Managing Partner of the Law Firm "De Facto".
 
Raissova B.A. - lawyer of the South Kazakhstan regional bar association, a member of the Supreme Judicial Council of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
 
Subproject:
Optimal judicial procedures
Zhukenov A.S. - Chairman of the Saryarka District Court of Astana city of Astana, Saryarka District Court
 
Fair court practice
 
Head: Zhamanova A.A. - retired judge, consultant to the World Bank project
 
Manager: Isabekova L.Z. - Deputy Head of the Secretariat of the Chairman of the Supreme Court
Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan
 
Administrator: Zhienbaeva M.K. - Chief Consultant of the Legal Support Division of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Phone: 8-7172-71-01-62
 
Consultants / Supervisors:
Kuanyshbaeva RA - Judge of the Supreme Court
Almagambetova G.Zh. - Judge of the Supreme Court
Mergenova G.Zh. - Judge of the Supreme Court

The project is planned to be implemented through the following key areas: "Simplified litigation", "Optimal judicial procedures" and "Fair court practice".

As a result of work in these areas, it is assumed:

  • minimize the number of procedural actions of the court of organizational and administrative nature; ensure their simplicity and clarity;
  • review the system for assessing the quality of the administration of justice;
  • exclude hidden red tape in the courts;
  • reduce the extrajudicial burden of judges;
  • ensure strict adherence to the principles of justice;
  • ensure transparency in decision-making, legal certainty for the most common categories of disputes, and so on.

 

Stages

Terms

Start

Ending

Stage 1: 2018

1.1.1.

Develop proposals to reduce the excessive repression of the criminal process and its humanization, as well as to expand the scope of alternative measures to imprisonment (fines, restrictions on freedom)

March

2018

May

2018

1.1.2.

Determine the jurisdiction of the investigative courts as part of amending the existing legislation

March 2018

April 2018

1.1.3.

Development of a methodology for conducting the process for investigative courts

April 2018

December 2018

1.1.4.

Proposal for revision of criteria for assessing the procedural activity of judges

April 2018

December 2018

1.1.5.

Introduce proposals for the introduction of standards of evidence, human rights standards in criminal prosecution

April 2018

May 2018

1.1.6.

Expanding the scope of mediation in the criminal process

April 2018

May 2018

1.2.1.

Apply project management in the work on the AAPC project (analyzes, studies, international experience)

March 2018

December 2018

1.2.2.

Conduct an analysis of court practice on claims involving state bodies

May 2018

December 2018

1.3.1.

Participation in the development of new Rules for access to courts

March 2018

April 2018

1.3.2.

Development of the publication standard for judicial acts

April 2018

May 2018

1.3.3.

Development of proposals in the Regulatory Resolution on the issues of publicity of proceedings

May 2018

June 2018

1.4.1.

Develop a standard of conduct for the judge in the process

April 2018

August 2018

1.5.1.

Change of tariffs for payment for the services of translators (Government Decree)

April 2018

September 2018

1.5.2.

Conducting an analysis of the quality of the administration of justice in the state language

May 2018

December 2018

2.1.3.

Proposals for the formation and systematization of analytical bases of judicial practice (in conjunction with E-Sot)

April 2018

December 2018

2.2.2.

Elaboration of criteria for distinguishing judicial errors from abuse

April 2018

December 2018

3.3.1.

To analyze the effectiveness of private decisions, definitions

April 2018

December 2018

3.3.2.

Proposals based on analysis of the mechanisms of liability for abuse of rights

April 2018

December 2018

3.4.1.

Simplify the civil process (reduction of cases of mandative production, expansion of the application of the institution of executive inscriptions, reduction of the list of authorized actions of the CIC)

March 2018

December 2018

3.4.3.

Development of procedural rules for digitalization of the process and proposals for improving the digitalization of the process

April 2018

December 2018

3.4.4.

Elaboration of proposals to exclude orders not related to the administration of justice

April 2018

December 2018

Stage 2: 2019

1.1.7.

Development of recommendations for law enforcement agencies to reduce the accusatory bias

June 2018

June 2019

1.1.8.

Pilot probation project

April 2018

April 2019

1.1.9.

Development of a training course for judges on the theory of evidence, the organization of courses with the invitation of international lecturers

September 2018

September 2019

1.4.2.

Participation in the organization of training courses for judges on psychological techniques and skills of communication with citizens

August 2018

August 2019

2.1.1.

Development of a unified approach to specific issues of law enforcement

June 2018

June 2019

2.1.2.

Analyze and develop proposals for improving judicial practice in cases related to entrepreneurial activities (in conjunction with the Atameken NPP)

April 2018

March 2019

2.2.3.

Elaboration of proposals to minimize the influence of chairmen of courts

May 2018

January 2019

2.2.4.

Identify the "real" level of corruption in the decision, the degree of influence of the chairmen of the courts on justice in conjunction with the "Atameken"

June 2018

June 2019

3.1.1.

Development of effective criteria for assessing the procedural actions of judges

June 2018

June 2019

3.2.1.

Development of the draft Law on Amendments to the CCP on simplification of judicial procedures

April 2018

September 2019

3.2.2.

To improve the quality of litigation by developing a methodology for all categories of cases

April 2018

August 2019

3.2.3.

Elaboration of proposals on the expediency of limitation of cassation appeal of judicial acts

March 2018

March 2019

3.2.4.

To create a training program for judges on the organization and planning of the trial process in conjunction with the Academy of Justice

July 2018

July 2019

3.2.5.

Analysis of the possibility of increasing the active role of the court

July 2018

July 2019

3.2.6.

Development of proposals to improve the efficiency of process planning

July 2018

July 2019

3.4.2.

Pilot project on mediation in court

April 2018

December 2019

4.1.1.

Reduce unnecessary procedures and judicial acts by mapping business processes across all types of process

June 2018

September 2019

4.1.2.

Alignment with KGD MF Creation of a single BCF (intermediate code) for payment of state duty

June 2018

June 2019

4.1.3

Development of a draft law on amending the Tax and Budget Codes on the introduction of a unified CSC

June 2018

June 2019

Stage 3: 2019

1.1.10.

Proposal to the procedural legislation on the expansion of the probation institute (based on the results of the pilot project)

October 2019

January 2020

1.5.3.

Establishment of an interpreter service in courts

October 2019

December 2020

2.2.1.

Analysis of the norms of wide interpretation

January 2019

December 2020

3.2.7.

Amendments to the procedural legislation based on the results of the project

January 2019

December 2020

 

 

No

Name of restriction

Description of restriction

1

Financing

To conduct research, analysis, development of methodology, mapping of business processes, appropriate financial resources are needed

2

Human resources

Qualified specialists are needed to carry out activities within the program

No

Name of the assumption

Description of the assumption

1

Decrease in the accusatory bias

revision of the performance of law enforcement agencies

2

Citizen and state are equal participants in the process

adoption of the AAPC, establishment of administrative courts

3

Ensuring the right to publicity of the process

with observance of the order in the courtroom and the rights of the participants in the processes for inviolability of private life

4

Ensuring the right of everyone to be heard in court

in case of reduction of the extrajudicial burden and the burden of indisputable cases

5

Improving the quality of translation in the process

availability of funding

6

Reduction of the number of court errors

definition of norms of wide interpretation, exclusion of the interests of judges

7

Reducing the abuse of judges in the adoption of judicial acts

interaction with law enforcement bodies, NPP Atameken

8

Revision of the system for assessing the procedural actions of judges

conducting of a sociological survey

9

Rules of procedure for the judge in all types of proceedings

availability of qualified specialists in the development of methodology, interaction with the Academy of Justice

10

Effective mechanism to protect against abuse of procedural rights

introduction of amendments and additions to the legislation

11

Judges are exempt from extrajudicial functions

introduction of changes and additions to the legislation, lack of human and technological resources

12

Simplification of judicial procedures for all types of processes

availability of qualified specialists (companies) in mapping, making changes and amendments to the legislation

 

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.