Portfolio of priority projects of the Supreme Court

No

Name of constraints

Description of constraints

1.

No data on prisoners of extrajudicial participative

There is no statistical data on number of prisoners of extrajudicial participative due to lack of accounting

2.

It is required to conduct a sociological interview

For measurements of the changes, received on the results of the activities of the Program

3.

No readiness to changes

Managers of state bodies are not ready to changes

4.

Complexity of fast obtaining of large data on judicial system

For holding generalizations and analyzes on  new methodologies of access to documents proceedings  has a key value

No.

Name of assumptions

Description of assumptions

1.

Stakeholder support (interested state bodies, lawyers)

For implementation of tasks programs it is necessary to involve interested state bodies and advocacy communities at the framework of law draft works and intensify legal assistance and other

2.

Tasks, directions project change by the agreement with the Customer of the project 

Customer can change tasks and directions

3.

 Implementation timing of project may to move due to change of its tasks, shortages resources, confrontations of stakeholders and other objective reasons

Changes of the  program tasks, lack of resources, including staffing, confrontations of stakeholders and other may affect the  terms of implementation of  program activities.

4.

Project implements tasks, related with the tasks of projects “E-Sot”,

"Communication strategy" and on issues of creating convenient website of the Supreme Court, information services at the framework of "E- Discovery» and

«E - CIVIL», project "Ideal process"

- on issues of abuse of the rights by the participants of the process and the new methodologies of generalizations of judicial practice.

Effective realization of tasks by creation of convenient website of the  Supreme Court, information services within the framework of "E- Discovery " and " E - CIVIL " depends on close interactions with project teams of “E-Sot”, "Communication strategy" on issues of abuse of the rights by the participants and a e new methodology of generalization of judicial practices - from team

project "Ideal process".

5.

Qualitative PR company of information resources, samples contracts, extrajudicial participative.

Qualitative PR company will provide clear explanations on utility and        accessibility of information resources,  contract samples and extrajudicial          participative.

No

Name constraints

Description constraints

1.

External subjective factors, influencing quality            communications

Resonant judicial solutions, by which courts will unilaterally inform mass media and public.

It may be gain critics from state structures at whole in connection with such phenomena as worsening of socio-economic situation, growth of prices, tariffs of housing and utilities and other.

2.

Absence of target funding on some areas of programs

Conducting social measurements and invitation of foreign experts for trainings is planned to make fully on the funding of partners of the  Supreme Court.  Stall is available due to that there will not by any means for this.

3.

Inadequate staffingpotential

Taking account of low wages, specificity of work and requirements of state service (at courts there are mainly lawyers) it will be complicated to find effective communicators on places.

No

Name of assumptions

Description of assumptions

1.1.

Mass media understand specificity of work of courts and correctly inform population on the activities of  judicial systems

Mass media contribute to the formation of public opinions. At this communications in principle it is important that mass media illuminated the judicial processes from understanding of procedural specificity and respect presumption of innocence. Also it is important that mass media introduced and respected information culture at coverage of court works, did not give unverified information, data, which may hurt entities of judicial process, especially the minors.

1.2.

Involving of third-party authoritative organization on holding public opinion polls.

Financing by line of partners

It will provide an objectivity of social research, and also confidence to its results with help of society.

1.3.

Inclusion in composition of the Council of authoritative experts and members of the public

It will provide efficiency of work of Council, relevance of its agenda and real feedback on issues which really care society on court activities. Interesting and reasoned expert offers    will be provided on further development of judicial system

1.4.

Adjustment of legislation or ND of the SC

It will provide complete regulation of issues of ensuring the publicity of judicial processes, including in terms of responsibility of judges

1.5.

Implementation of SC projects on further development of judicial system

It will be conducted the real job on reforming judicial system on relevant issues of court activities. For mass media and societies it will be created holistic picture of development of judicial systems and what issues it will solve at the course of this.

1.6.

Topical and understandable content of the courts including revealing of problematic aspects of proceedings

Information of the courts must be understandable for mass media and societies and be provided in a timely manner at the moment  of appearance of interest in it.  It must also answer to problematic issues on the court activities

1.7.

Built internal interaction of courts, also cooperation with interested state bodies

Courts jointly with interested public bodies must satisfy informational queries of the societies on resonance judicial cases. It is required to give clear answers on logic of judicial acts, to disclose information at maximum understandable way for the population 

1.8.

Trial statistics and other important information on court activities. Methodical recommendations on population services, provided by courts in terms of trial

For mass media and the public it is highly important in  case of need to apply to real statistical data and other information on court activities. They must know where it can be found at any convenient time for them. For population it is important to understand how courts work at trail, how to apply to court

1.9.

New format  of lighting of Sc work on the adoption of ND

Considering an important role of ND of the SC on trails for the public and for professional legal community it is highly important to understand the essence of the changes at ND, position of interested structures on them. This will enhance practical benefit from ND, it will allow to ensure more complete participation of the interested individuals at their development.

2.1.

Decrease of loads for judges -coordinators on work with MASS MEDIA, introduction of surcharges for them, additional opportunity for career growth and other

Judges relate to work with mass media and the publicity as to an additional, extra load. This work is estimated in anyway, there is no motivation for its holding on high level. It is required to build a motivation system in order that communication with mass media to be perceived by judges as an important direction of work. It can be done by declining of judicial load, enlargement of payment, additional instruments on stimulating a career growth. Career growth of court employees also depends on the communication.

2.2.

Courts built a system of interactions on unified informational agenda with mass media 

Targeted work of courts with mass media on covering the activities of judicial system. Clear planning of this work in connecting with specific indicators. Availability of clear thematic plan on reforming of judicial systems at  the framework of «7 stones of justice"

2.3.

Judges and employees of the courts are motivated on improvement of their work

A clear system of  internal motivation on improve of the work is built. Acquaintance with modern technicians, concepts on personal growth.

2.4.

Clear portal for judges and employees, system of feedback on important issues of court activities

System of feedback from judges and employees of the courts on relevant issues of development of courts. Access to an important literature on personal growth, complete information the development of judicial systems