In Semey, the court restored the grossly violated employee labor rights

G. went to Semey City Court with a legal claim against the mini-center "Balgyn" about the restoration at work, the recovery of wages for the time of forced absenteeism and compensation for moral harm.

The legal claim is motivated by the fact that he worked for the defendant as a tutor of the younger group. On September 23, 2016, the labor contract with him was terminated on the initiative of the employer. After applying to the state inspector for labor protection, the defendant issued a new order on November 1, in which he indicated the initiative of the employee for the termination of the employment contract.

In the court session it was established that the plaintiff's statement did not contain the date of signing the document by the employee, from what time he asked to terminate the employment contract and whether he agreed to terminate the contract before the notice expired. In the application there was only an employer visa for dismissal. The defendant did not comply with the requirements of the Labor Code, providing for the termination of the employment contract on the initiative of the employee, as a result, the latter was deprived of the right to withdraw the application.

By a court decision, the legal claims were partially satisfied. It was decided to restore the plaintiff to his former place of work and collect wages from the employer for the time of forced absence in the amount of KZT156,392, as well as compensation for moral damage in the amount of 10,000 tenge.

The court's decision did not come into legal force.